How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Latvia

0.0261 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Panama

0.0274 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

109th

Panama rank

107th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Latvia
Panama

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0274 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 109th and Panama ranks 107th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Panama	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0072 million USD per square kilometre	0.0085 million USD per square kilometre	0.0013 million USD per square kilometre	Panama
2000s	0.0104 million USD per square kilometre	0.0128 million USD per square kilometre	0.0024 million USD per square kilometre	Panama
2010s	0.0167 million USD per square kilometre	0.0196 million USD per square kilometre	0.0029 million USD per square kilometre	Panama
2020s	0.0262 million USD per square kilometre	0.0253 million USD per square kilometre	0.0009 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Latvia or Panama?: Panama, at 0.0274 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Latvia and Panama?: 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Panama?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Panama rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Latvia ranks 109th and Panama ranks 107th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/panama/">Latvia vs Panama: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.