How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Latvia

0.0261 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sierra Leone

0.0258 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

109th

Sierra Leone rank

110th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Latvia
Sierra Leone

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0258 million USD per square kilometre in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 109th and Sierra Leone ranks 110th of 180 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Sierra Leone	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0072 million USD per square kilometre	0.0069 million USD per square kilometre	0.0002 million USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.0104 million USD per square kilometre	0.0116 million USD per square kilometre	0.0013 million USD per square kilometre	Sierra Leone
2010s	0.0167 million USD per square kilometre	0.0297 million USD per square kilometre	0.013 million USD per square kilometre	Sierra Leone
2020s	0.0262 million USD per square kilometre	0.0313 million USD per square kilometre	0.0051 million USD per square kilometre	Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Latvia or Sierra Leone?: Latvia, at 0.0261 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0258 million USD per square kilometre in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Latvia and Sierra Leone?: 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sierra Leone?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Sierra Leone rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Latvia ranks 109th and Sierra Leone ranks 110th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/latvia/sierra-leone/">Latvia vs Sierra Leone: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.