How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malawi?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lithuania vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Lithuania

0.0346 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Malawi

0.0349 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania rank

96th

Malawi rank

95th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Lithuania
Malawi

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0349 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0346 million USD per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 96th and Malawi ranks 95th of 180 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lithuania	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0132 million USD per square kilometre	0.0115 million USD per square kilometre	0.0017 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2000s	0.0158 million USD per square kilometre	0.0141 million USD per square kilometre	0.0017 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2010s	0.0246 million USD per square kilometre	0.0215 million USD per square kilometre	0.0031 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2020s	0.037 million USD per square kilometre	0.0341 million USD per square kilometre	0.0029 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Lithuania or Malawi?: Malawi, at 0.0349 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0346 million USD per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Lithuania and Malawi?: 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Malawi?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Malawi rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Lithuania ranks 96th and Malawi ranks 95th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/malawi/">Lithuania vs Malawi: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.