How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Montenegro?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lithuania vs Montenegro: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Lithuania

0.0346 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Montenegro

0.0306 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania rank

96th

Montenegro rank

99th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Lithuania
Montenegro

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0346 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0306 million USD per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 0.004 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 96th and Montenegro ranks 99th of 180 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lithuania	Montenegro	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0202 million USD per square kilometre	0.0218 million USD per square kilometre	0.0016 million USD per square kilometre	Montenegro
2010s	0.0246 million USD per square kilometre	0.0255 million USD per square kilometre	0.0009 million USD per square kilometre	Montenegro
2020s	0.037 million USD per square kilometre	0.0284 million USD per square kilometre	0.0086 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Lithuania or Montenegro?: Lithuania, at 0.0346 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0306 million USD per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Lithuania and Montenegro?: 0.004 million USD per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Montenegro?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Montenegro rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Lithuania ranks 96th and Montenegro ranks 99th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Montenegro: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/montenegro/">Lithuania vs Montenegro: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.