How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Togo?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lithuania vs Togo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Lithuania

0.0346 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Togo

0.0311 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania rank

96th

Togo rank

98th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Lithuania
Togo

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0346 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0311 million USD per square kilometre in Togo, a difference of 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 96th and Togo ranks 98th of 180 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Lithuania	Togo	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0132 million USD per square kilometre	0.0089 million USD per square kilometre	0.0043 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2000s	0.0158 million USD per square kilometre	0.0117 million USD per square kilometre	0.0041 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2010s	0.0246 million USD per square kilometre	0.022 million USD per square kilometre	0.0026 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2020s	0.037 million USD per square kilometre	0.0287 million USD per square kilometre	0.0083 million USD per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Lithuania or Togo?: Lithuania, at 0.0346 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0311 million USD per square kilometre in Togo as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Lithuania and Togo?: 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Togo?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Lithuania and Togo rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Lithuania ranks 96th and Togo ranks 98th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Togo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/togo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/lithuania/togo/">Lithuania vs Togo: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.