Mauritania vs Mongolia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Mauritania
0.0019 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0.0013 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
171st
Mongolia rank
173rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Mauritania
  • Mongolia
00.0010.0010.0020.002197019962023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.5 times Mongolia's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 171st and Mongolia ranks 173rd of 180 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Mongolia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Mauritania or Mongolia?
Mauritania, at 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Mauritania and Mongolia?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Mongolia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Mongolia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Mauritania ranks 171st and Mongolia ranks 173rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Mongolia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/mongolia/">Mauritania vs Mongolia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.