Mauritania vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Mauritania
0.0019 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.002 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
171st
Suriname rank
170th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Mauritania
  • Suriname
00.0010.0020.0030.004197019962023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.002 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 171st and Suriname ranks 170th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Suriname Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.001 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0028 million USD per square kilometre 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0018 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Mauritania or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.002 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Mauritania and Suriname?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Suriname?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Suriname rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Mauritania ranks 171st and Suriname ranks 170th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/suriname/">Mauritania vs Suriname: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.