Mongolia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Mongolia
0.0013 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0012 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
173rd
Namibia rank
175th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Mongolia
  • Namibia
00.0010.0010.002197019962023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Namibia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 173rd and Namibia ranks 175th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
1990s 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0 million USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Mongolia or Namibia?
Mongolia, at 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Mongolia and Namibia?
0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Mongolia ranks 173rd and Namibia ranks 175th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/namibia/">Mongolia vs Namibia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.