Mozambique vs Niger: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Mozambique
0.0069 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Niger
0.0063 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
151st
Niger rank
153rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Mozambique
  • Niger
00.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0063 million USD per square kilometre in Niger, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Niger's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.

Mozambique ranks 151st and Niger ranks 153rd of 180 countries.

Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Niger Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre 0.0004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 0.003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre 0.0007 million USD per square kilometre 0.0008 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 0.0026 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre 0.0013 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 0.0059 million USD per square kilometre 0.005 million USD per square kilometre 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Mozambique or Niger?
Mozambique, at 0.0069 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0063 million USD per square kilometre in Niger as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Mozambique and Niger?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Niger?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Niger rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Mozambique ranks 151st and Niger ranks 153rd of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Niger: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/niger/">Mozambique vs Niger: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.