How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sudan?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Namibia

0.0012 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan

0.001 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia rank

175th

Sudan rank

177th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Namibia
Sudan

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre against 0.001 million USD per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Namibia ranks 175th and Sudan ranks 177th of 180 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	Sudan	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0011 million USD per square kilometre	0.0107 million USD per square kilometre	0.0096 million USD per square kilometre	Sudan
2020s	0.0013 million USD per square kilometre	0.0031 million USD per square kilometre	0.0019 million USD per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Namibia or Sudan?: Namibia, at 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre against 0.001 million USD per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Namibia and Sudan?: 0.0002 million USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sudan?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Sudan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Namibia ranks 175th and Sudan ranks 177th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/sudan/">Namibia vs Sudan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.