How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Slovenia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Qatar vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Qatar

0.0543 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Slovenia

0.0522 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Qatar rank

68th

Slovenia rank

69th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Qatar
Slovenia

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0543 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0522 million USD per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

Qatar ranks 68th and Slovenia ranks 69th of 180 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Qatar	Slovenia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0066 million USD per square kilometre	0.0365 million USD per square kilometre	0.0299 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2000s	0.0067 million USD per square kilometre	0.0389 million USD per square kilometre	0.0322 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2010s	0.0231 million USD per square kilometre	0.0449 million USD per square kilometre	0.0218 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia
2020s	0.049 million USD per square kilometre	0.0499 million USD per square kilometre	0.0009 million USD per square kilometre	Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Qatar or Slovenia?: Qatar, at 0.0543 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0522 million USD per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Qatar and Slovenia?: 0.0021 million USD per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Slovenia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Slovenia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Qatar ranks 68th and Slovenia ranks 69th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/qatar/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/qatar/slovenia/">Qatar vs Slovenia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.