San Marino vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

San Marino
0.0038 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0032 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino rank
165th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • San Marino
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01197019962023

How they compare

San Marino currently reports 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes San Marino's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

San Marino ranks 165th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, San Marino averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade San Marino Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0009 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0025 million USD per square kilometre 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.006 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.002 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2000s 0.0083 million USD per square kilometre 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre 0.0048 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2010s 0.0058 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0017 million USD per square kilometre San Marino
2020s 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0046 million USD per square kilometre 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, San Marino or Zimbabwe?
San Marino, at 0.0038 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between San Marino and Zimbabwe?
0.0006 million USD per square kilometre, with San Marino ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do San Marino and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
San Marino ranks 165th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

San Marino vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/san-marino/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/san-marino/zimbabwe/">San Marino vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.