How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sudan vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Sudan

0.001 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Zambia

0.0011 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan rank

177th

Zambia rank

176th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Sudan
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre against 0.001 million USD per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Sudan ranks 177th and Zambia ranks 176th of 180 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sudan	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0107 million USD per square kilometre	0.0021 million USD per square kilometre	0.0086 million USD per square kilometre	Sudan
2020s	0.0031 million USD per square kilometre	0.001 million USD per square kilometre	0.0021 million USD per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Sudan or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre against 0.001 million USD per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Sudan and Zambia?: 0.0001 million USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Sudan ranks 177th and Zambia ranks 176th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zambia/">Sudan vs Zambia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.