Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Suriname
0.002 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0032 million USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
170th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

  • Suriname
  • Zimbabwe
00.0020.0040.006197019962023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre against 0.002 million USD per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Suriname's.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Suriname ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0003 million USD per square kilometre 0.0014 million USD per square kilometre 0.0011 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0006 million USD per square kilometre 0.0029 million USD per square kilometre 0.0023 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0015 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0024 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0016 million USD per square kilometre 0.0035 million USD per square kilometre 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0028 million USD per square kilometre 0.004 million USD per square kilometre 0.0012 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0019 million USD per square kilometre 0.0046 million USD per square kilometre 0.0027 million USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0032 million USD per square kilometre against 0.002 million USD per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
0.0012 million USD per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?
Suriname ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/suriname/zimbabwe/">Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit
million USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.