How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Turkmenistan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sweden vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per

Sweden

0.0143 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Turkmenistan

0.0148 million USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Sweden rank

130th

Turkmenistan rank

129th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per over time

Sweden
Turkmenistan

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0148 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0143 million USD per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 130th and Turkmenistan ranks 129th of 180 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sweden	Turkmenistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0159 million USD per square kilometre	0.0012 million USD per square kilometre	0.0147 million USD per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	0.0133 million USD per square kilometre	0.0047 million USD per square kilometre	0.0086 million USD per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	0.0172 million USD per square kilometre	0.0076 million USD per square kilometre	0.0096 million USD per square kilometre	Sweden
2020s	0.0156 million USD per square kilometre	0.0131 million USD per square kilometre	0.0025 million USD per square kilometre	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per, Sweden or Turkmenistan?: Turkmenistan, at 0.0148 million USD per square kilometre against 0.0143 million USD per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per between Sweden and Turkmenistan?: 0.0005 million USD per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Turkmenistan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Sweden and Turkmenistan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per?: Sweden ranks 130th and Turkmenistan ranks 129th of 180 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/sweden/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-square-kilometre/sweden/turkmenistan/">Sweden vs Turkmenistan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per square kilometre
Unit: million USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 181 places, 9,031 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.