How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sweden?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Austria

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Sweden

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Austria rank

152nd

Sweden rank

154th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Austria
Sweden

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 152nd and Sweden ranks 154th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Sweden
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Sweden
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Sweden
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Sweden
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Sweden
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Austria or Sweden?: Austria, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Austria and Sweden?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sweden?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Austria and Sweden rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Austria ranks 152nd and Sweden ranks 154th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/sweden/">Austria vs Sweden: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.