How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Samoa?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bangladesh vs Samoa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Bangladesh

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Samoa

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bangladesh rank

59th

Samoa rank

57th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Bangladesh
Samoa

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 59th and Samoa ranks 57th of 179 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bangladesh	Samoa	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Bangladesh or Samoa?: Samoa, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Bangladesh and Samoa?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Samoa?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Samoa rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Bangladesh ranks 59th and Samoa ranks 57th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Samoa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bangladesh/samoa/">Bangladesh vs Samoa: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.