How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Canada?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Canada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Barbados

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Canada

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Barbados rank

146th

Canada rank

145th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Barbados
Canada

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Barbados, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 146th and Canada ranks 145th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Canada in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Canada	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Barbados
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Barbados
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Canada
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Barbados
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Barbados or Canada?: Canada, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Barbados as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Barbados and Canada?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Canada?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Canada rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Barbados ranks 146th and Canada ranks 145th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Canada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/barbados/canada/">Barbados vs Canada: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.