How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Germany: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Belgium

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Germany

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Belgium rank

162nd

Germany rank

161st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Belgium
Germany

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 162nd and Germany ranks 161st of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 4 and Germany in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Germany	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Belgium
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Belgium
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Belgium
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Belgium
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Germany
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Belgium or Germany?: Germany, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Belgium and Germany?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Germany?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Belgium and Germany rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Belgium ranks 162nd and Germany ranks 161st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Germany: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/belgium/germany/">Belgium vs Germany: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.