How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Indonesia?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs Indonesia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Bhutan

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Indonesia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bhutan rank

51st

Indonesia rank

54th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Bhutan
Indonesia

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Indonesia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Indonesia ahead.

Bhutan ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 54th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 5 and Indonesia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	Indonesia	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Indonesia
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Bhutan or Indonesia?: Bhutan, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Indonesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Bhutan and Indonesia?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Indonesia?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Indonesia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Bhutan ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 54th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Indonesia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/indonesia/">Bhutan vs Indonesia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.