How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malta?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Burundi

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Burundi rank

6th

Malta rank

8th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Burundi
Malta

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Malta, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 6th and Malta ranks 8th of 179 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Malta	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Burundi or Malta?: Burundi, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Burundi and Malta?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malta?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Malta rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Burundi ranks 6th and Malta ranks 8th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/malta/">Burundi vs Malta: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.