How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and India?

50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cambodia vs India: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Cambodia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

India

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Cambodia rank

43rd

India rank

42nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Cambodia
India

How they compare

India currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Cambodia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 43rd and India ranks 42nd of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 5 and India in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cambodia	India	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Cambodia
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Cambodia or India?: India, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Cambodia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Cambodia and India?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and India?: 50 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and India rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Cambodia ranks 43rd and India ranks 42nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs India: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cambodia/india/">Cambodia vs India: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.