How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Chile

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Latvia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

106th

Latvia rank

107th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Chile
Latvia

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.

Chile ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 107th of 179 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Latvia
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Chile
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Chile
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Chile or Latvia?: Chile, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Chile and Latvia?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Chile ranks 106th and Latvia ranks 107th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/latvia/">Chile vs Latvia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.