How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Chile

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Mauritius

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

106th

Mauritius rank

103rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Chile
Mauritius

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mauritius ahead.

Chile ranks 106th and Mauritius ranks 103rd of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Mauritius	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Mauritius
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Chile
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Chile or Mauritius?: Mauritius, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Chile and Mauritius?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Mauritius?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and Mauritius rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Chile ranks 106th and Mauritius ranks 103rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/mauritius/">Chile vs Mauritius: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.