How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?

30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Chile

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Serbia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

106th

Serbia rank

105th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Chile
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 30 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 105th of 179 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Chile or Serbia?: Serbia, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Chile and Serbia?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Chile ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 105th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/serbia/">Chile vs Serbia: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.