How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Japan?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Germany vs Japan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Germany

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Japan

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Germany rank

161st

Japan rank

159th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Germany
Japan

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Germany, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Japan ahead.

Germany ranks 161st and Japan ranks 159th of 179 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Germany	Japan	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Japan
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Japan
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Japan
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Japan
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Japan
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Germany or Japan?: Japan, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Germany as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Germany and Japan?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Japan?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Germany and Japan rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Germany ranks 161st and Japan ranks 159th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Japan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/germany/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/germany/japan/">Germany vs Japan: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.