How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Myanmar?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Guatemala

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Myanmar

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Guatemala rank

63rd

Myanmar rank

62nd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Guatemala
Myanmar

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Guatemala, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 63rd and Myanmar ranks 62nd of 179 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	Myanmar	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Myanmar
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Myanmar
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Myanmar
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Myanmar
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Myanmar
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Guatemala or Myanmar?: Myanmar, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Guatemala and Myanmar?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Myanmar?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Myanmar rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Guatemala ranks 63rd and Myanmar ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/myanmar/">Guatemala vs Myanmar: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.