How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Nepal?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Madagascar vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Madagascar

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Nepal

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Madagascar rank

27th

Nepal rank

29th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Madagascar
Nepal

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Nepal ahead.

Madagascar ranks 27th and Nepal ranks 29th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Madagascar	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Nepal
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Madagascar or Nepal?: Madagascar, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Madagascar and Nepal?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Nepal?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Madagascar and Nepal rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Madagascar ranks 27th and Nepal ranks 29th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/madagascar/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/madagascar/nepal/">Madagascar vs Nepal: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.