How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Rwanda?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Madagascar vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Madagascar

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Rwanda

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Madagascar rank

27th

Rwanda rank

24th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Madagascar
Rwanda

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Madagascar, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Madagascar ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 24th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Madagascar	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Madagascar
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Madagascar or Rwanda?: Rwanda, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Madagascar as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Madagascar and Rwanda?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Rwanda?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Madagascar and Rwanda rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Madagascar ranks 27th and Rwanda ranks 24th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/madagascar/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/madagascar/rwanda/">Madagascar vs Rwanda: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.