How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Oman?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Caledonia vs Oman: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

New Caledonia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Oman

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia rank

133rd

Oman rank

131st

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

New Caledonia
Oman

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Oman ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 133rd and Oman ranks 131st of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Oman in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Caledonia	Oman	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Oman
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Oman
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Oman
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, New Caledonia or Oman?: Oman, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between New Caledonia and Oman?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Oman?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Oman rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: New Caledonia ranks 133rd and Oman ranks 131st of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Oman: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/oman/">New Caledonia vs Oman: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.