How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Spain?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Caledonia vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

New Caledonia

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Spain

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia rank

133rd

Spain rank

130th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

New Caledonia
Spain

How they compare

Spain currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

Across all 55 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 133rd and Spain ranks 130th of 179 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Caledonia	Spain	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Spain
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Spain
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Spain
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Spain
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Spain
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, New Caledonia or Spain?: Spain, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between New Caledonia and Spain?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Spain?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Spain rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: New Caledonia ranks 133rd and Spain ranks 130th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/spain/">New Caledonia vs Spain: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.