How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Tuvalu?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Samoa vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

Samoa

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Tuvalu

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Samoa rank

57th

Tuvalu rank

60th

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

Samoa
Tuvalu

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 57th and Tuvalu ranks 60th of 179 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Samoa	Tuvalu	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Samoa
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Samoa
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Samoa
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Tuvalu
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, Samoa or Tuvalu?: Samoa, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in Tuvalu as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between Samoa and Tuvalu?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Tuvalu?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Samoa and Tuvalu rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: Samoa ranks 57th and Tuvalu ranks 60th of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Samoa vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/samoa/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/samoa/tuvalu/">Samoa vs Tuvalu: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.