How many years of comparable data are there for World and Zimbabwe?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

World vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit

World

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0 million USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

World rank

1st

Zimbabwe rank

3rd

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit over time

World
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in World, a difference of 0 million USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 11.9 times World's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

World ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 1 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	World	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1980s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
1990s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2000s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	0 million USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit, World or Zimbabwe?: Zimbabwe, at 0 million USD per US$ of GDP against 0 million USD per US$ of GDP in World as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit between World and Zimbabwe?: 0 million USD per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for World and Zimbabwe?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do World and Zimbabwe rank globally for value added (agriculture, forestry and fishing) — value us$, per unit?: World ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 3rd of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

World vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/world/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-us-per-unit-of-gdp/world/zimbabwe/">World vs Zimbabwe: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$, per unit of GDP
Unit: million USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 180 places, 8,888 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed: 12 September 2026

Value Added (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value US$ divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.