Papua New Guinea vs Palestine: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value

Papua New Guinea
171.17 SLC
in 2024
Palestine
174.74 SLC
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
61st
Palestine rank
59th

Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Palestine
050100150197019972024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 174.74 SLC against 171.17 SLC in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 3.57 SLC.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Palestine ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 61st and Palestine ranks 59th of 191 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Palestine in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Palestine Difference Ahead
1970s 10.16 SLC 32.44 SLC 22.28 SLC Palestine
1980s 16.53 SLC 55.03 SLC 38.5 SLC Palestine
1990s 27.42 SLC 64.27 SLC 36.85 SLC Palestine
2000s 59.53 SLC 66.89 SLC 7.36 SLC Palestine
2010s 99.76 SLC 99.72 SLC 0.0441 SLC Papua New Guinea
2020s 149.93 SLC 130.22 SLC 19.71 SLC Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value, Papua New Guinea or Palestine?
Palestine, at 174.74 SLC against 171.17 SLC in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value between Papua New Guinea and Palestine?
3.57 SLC, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Palestine?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Palestine rank globally for value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value?
Papua New Guinea ranks 61st and Palestine ranks 59th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Palestine: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency-2015/papua-new-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency-2015/papua-new-guinea/west-bank-and-gaza/">Papua New Guinea vs Palestine: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
207 places, 10,733 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Deflators database provides the following selection of price deflator series by country and at regional level: Gross Domestic Product deflator, Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, Manufacturing Value-Added deflator, and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery Valued-Added deflator. In the FAOSTAT Deflators database, all series are derived from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Analysis of Main Aggregates database (UNSD AMA). In particular, the implicit Gross Domestic Product deflator, the implicit Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, the implicit value added deflator of Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery and the implicit value added deflator of Manufacturing are obtained by dividing the series in current prices by those in constant 2015 prices (base year).