Poland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value

Poland
195.54 SLC
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
198.27 SLC
in 2024
Poland rank
45th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
42nd

Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value over time

  • Poland
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050100150200197019972024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 198.27 SLC against 195.54 SLC in Poland, a difference of 2.73 SLC.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Poland ranks 45th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 42nd of 191 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0944 SLC 10.86 SLC 10.77 SLC Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.9256 SLC 34.12 SLC 33.19 SLC Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 38.22 SLC 30.39 SLC 7.84 SLC Poland
2000s 68.71 SLC 41.42 SLC 27.29 SLC Poland
2010s 110.69 SLC 104.46 SLC 6.23 SLC Poland
2020s 173.17 SLC 164.05 SLC 9.12 SLC Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value, Poland or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 198.27 SLC against 195.54 SLC in Poland as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value between Poland and Trinidad and Tobago?
2.73 SLC, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Trinidad and Tobago?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Poland and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value?
Poland ranks 45th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 42nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency-2015/poland/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency-2015/poland/trinidad-and-tobago/">Poland vs Trinidad and Tobago: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
207 places, 10,733 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Deflators database provides the following selection of price deflator series by country and at regional level: Gross Domestic Product deflator, Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, Manufacturing Value-Added deflator, and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery Valued-Added deflator. In the FAOSTAT Deflators database, all series are derived from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Analysis of Main Aggregates database (UNSD AMA). In particular, the implicit Gross Domestic Product deflator, the implicit Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, the implicit value added deflator of Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery and the implicit value added deflator of Manufacturing are obtained by dividing the series in current prices by those in constant 2015 prices (base year).