Republic of Moldova vs Viet Nam: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value

Republic of Moldova
215.86 SLC
in 2024
Viet Nam
136.55 SLC
in 2024
Republic of Moldova rank
7th
Viet Nam rank
10th

Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • Viet Nam
050100150200197019972024

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 215.86 SLC against 136.55 SLC in Viet Nam, a difference of 79.31 SLC.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.6 times Viet Nam's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Viet Nam ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 13 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1990s 9.47 SLC 16.4 SLC 6.93 SLC Viet Nam
2000s 35.97 SLC 35.98 SLC 0.0035 SLC Viet Nam
2010s 82.28 SLC 96.02 SLC 13.74 SLC Viet Nam
2020s 146.03 SLC 124.33 SLC 21.7 SLC Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value, Republic of Moldova or Viet Nam?
Republic of Moldova, at 215.86 SLC against 136.55 SLC in Viet Nam as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value between Republic of Moldova and Viet Nam?
79.31 SLC, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Viet Nam?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Republic of Moldova and Viet Nam rank globally for value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value?
Republic of Moldova ranks 7th and Viet Nam ranks 10th of 13 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs Viet Nam: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency-2015/republic-of-moldova/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-standard-local-currency-2015/republic-of-moldova/viet-nam-2/">Republic of Moldova vs Viet Nam: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
207 places, 10,733 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Deflators database provides the following selection of price deflator series by country and at regional level: Gross Domestic Product deflator, Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, Manufacturing Value-Added deflator, and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery Valued-Added deflator. In the FAOSTAT Deflators database, all series are derived from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Analysis of Main Aggregates database (UNSD AMA). In particular, the implicit Gross Domestic Product deflator, the implicit Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, the implicit value added deflator of Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery and the implicit value added deflator of Manufacturing are obtained by dividing the series in current prices by those in constant 2015 prices (base year).