China, mainland vs Tuvalu: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$

China, mainland
2.78 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tuvalu
2.61 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, mainland rank
105th
Tuvalu rank
108th

Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$ over time

  • China, mainland
  • Tuvalu
-20-100102030197119972024

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 2.78 % change on previous year against 2.61 % change on previous year in Tuvalu, a difference of 0.17 % change on previous year.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 1.1 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Tuvalu ahead.

China, mainland ranks 105th and Tuvalu ranks 108th of 219 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China, mainland averaged higher in 2 and Tuvalu in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1970s 8.47 % change on previous year 7.16 % change on previous year 1.31 % change on previous year China, mainland
1980s -1.35 % change on previous year 3.33 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year Tuvalu
1990s 0.8815 % change on previous year 2.73 % change on previous year 1.85 % change on previous year Tuvalu
2000s 7.19 % change on previous year 8.78 % change on previous year 1.59 % change on previous year Tuvalu
2010s 3.64 % change on previous year 1.76 % change on previous year 1.88 % change on previous year China, mainland
2020s 1.5 % change on previous year 7.22 % change on previous year 5.72 % change on previous year Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value us$, China, mainland or Tuvalu?
China, mainland, at 2.78 % change on previous year against 2.61 % change on previous year in Tuvalu as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value us$ between China, mainland and Tuvalu?
0.17 % change on previous year, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Tuvalu?
54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
How do China, mainland and Tuvalu rank globally for value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value us$?
China, mainland ranks 105th and Tuvalu ranks 108th of 219 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$, 2015 prices, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Tuvalu: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-us-2015-prices-annual-growth/china-mainland/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-us-2015-prices-annual-growth/china-mainland/tuvalu/">China, mainland vs Tuvalu: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$, 2015 prices, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,207 data points, 1971–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.