Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$

Chile
123.86 USD
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
123.27 USD
in 2024
Chile rank
101st
Papua New Guinea rank
102nd

Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$ over time

  • Chile
  • Papua New Guinea
255075100125197019972024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 123.86 USD against 123.27 USD in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.59 USD.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 102nd of 200 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 62.86 USD 36.9 USD 25.95 USD Chile
1980s 78.24 USD 54.6 USD 23.63 USD Chile
1990s 99.05 USD 57.83 USD 41.22 USD Chile
2000s 73.69 USD 53.47 USD 20.22 USD Chile
2010s 108.76 USD 100.56 USD 8.2 USD Chile
2020s 112.98 USD 115.6 USD 2.61 USD Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value us$, Chile or Papua New Guinea?
Chile, at 123.86 USD against 123.27 USD in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value us$ between Chile and Papua New Guinea?
0.59 USD, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Papua New Guinea?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Chile and Papua New Guinea rank globally for value added deflator (agriculture, forestry and fishery) — value us$?
Chile ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 102nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-us-2015-prices/chile/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/value-added-deflator-agriculture-forestry-and-fishery-value-us-2015-prices/chile/papua-new-guinea/">Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Value Added Deflator (Agriculture, forestry and fishery) — Value US$, 2015 prices
Unit
USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 12,452 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Deflators database provides the following selection of price deflator series by country and at regional level: Gross Domestic Product deflator, Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, Manufacturing Value-Added deflator, and Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery Valued-Added deflator. In the FAOSTAT Deflators database, all series are derived from the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) National Accounts Analysis of Main Aggregates database (UNSD AMA). In particular, the implicit Gross Domestic Product deflator, the implicit Gross Fixed Capital Formation deflator, the implicit value added deflator of Agriculture, Forestry, Fishery and the implicit value added deflator of Manufacturing are obtained by dividing the series in current prices by those in constant 2015 prices (base year).