Germany vs Luxembourg: Veneer sheets — Import quantity, per capita
Germany
0.0008 m3 per person
in 2024
Luxembourg
0.0006 m3 per person
in 2024
Germany rank
55th
Luxembourg rank
57th
Veneer sheets — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Germany
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0.0008 m3 per person against 0.0006 m3 per person in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0002 m3 per person.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 55th and Luxembourg ranks 57th of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0022 m3 per person | 0.0136 m3 per person | 0.0114 m3 per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.0014 m3 per person | 0.0012 m3 per person | 0.0002 m3 per person | Germany |
| 2020s | 0.0011 m3 per person | 0.001 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher veneer sheets — import quantity, per capita, Germany or Luxembourg?
- Germany, at 0.0008 m3 per person against 0.0006 m3 per person in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in veneer sheets — import quantity, per capita between Germany and Luxembourg?
- 0.0002 m3 per person, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Germany and Luxembourg rank globally for veneer sheets — import quantity, per capita?
- Germany ranks 55th and Luxembourg ranks 57th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Veneer sheets — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Veneer sheets — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.