Qatar vs Tunisia: Veneer sheets — Import quantity, per capita
Qatar
0.0004 m3 per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0.0004 m3 per person
in 2024
Qatar rank
66th
Tunisia rank
67th
Veneer sheets — Import quantity, per capita over time
- Qatar
- Tunisia
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0004 m3 per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 m3 per person.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.
Qatar ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 195 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 m3 per person | 0.0014 m3 per person | 0.0013 m3 per person | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0.0013 m3 per person | 0.0009 m3 per person | 0.0004 m3 per person | Qatar |
| 2010s | 0.0008 m3 per person | 0.0005 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | Qatar |
| 2020s | 0.0004 m3 per person | 0.0003 m3 per person | 0.0001 m3 per person | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher veneer sheets — import quantity, per capita, Qatar or Tunisia?
- Qatar, at 0.0004 m3 per person against 0.0004 m3 per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in veneer sheets — import quantity, per capita between Qatar and Tunisia?
- 0 m3 per person, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Tunisia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Qatar and Tunisia rank globally for veneer sheets — import quantity, per capita?
- Qatar ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Veneer sheets — Import quantity, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Veneer sheets — Import quantity divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.