Armenia vs Eswatini: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 13.99 kg/ha against 11.81 kg/ha in Armenia, a difference of 2.18 kg/ha.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Armenia ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 117th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.63 kg/ha | 7.13 kg/ha | 0.5016 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2000s | 14.58 kg/ha | 9.62 kg/ha | 4.96 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2010s | 37.21 kg/ha | 11.62 kg/ha | 25.59 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2020s | 14.2 kg/ha | 14.54 kg/ha | 0.3332 kg/ha | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Armenia or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 13.99 kg/ha against 11.81 kg/ha in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Armenia and Eswatini?
- 2.18 kg/ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Eswatini?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Eswatini rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 120th and Eswatini ranks 117th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).