Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Azerbaijan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 9.72 kg/ha against 8.4 kg/ha in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.32 kg/ha.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.66 kg/ha | 9.32 kg/ha | 3.66 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 4.18 kg/ha | 6.14 kg/ha | 1.97 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 9.38 kg/ha | 5.07 kg/ha | 4.3 kg/ha | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 8.1 kg/ha | 8.98 kg/ha | 0.8837 kg/ha | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Azerbaijan or Zimbabwe?
- Azerbaijan, at 9.72 kg/ha against 8.4 kg/ha in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
- 1.32 kg/ha, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Azerbaijan ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 131st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).