Belarus vs Czechia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Czechia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 37.36 kg/ha against 35.5 kg/ha in Czechia, a difference of 1.86 kg/ha.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Belarus ranks 44th and Czechia ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.86 kg/ha | 30.56 kg/ha | 7.71 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2000s | 29.99 kg/ha | 33.61 kg/ha | 3.61 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2010s | 35.55 kg/ha | 47.53 kg/ha | 11.98 kg/ha | Czechia |
| 2020s | 35.34 kg/ha | 41.89 kg/ha | 6.55 kg/ha | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Belarus or Czechia?
- Belarus, at 37.36 kg/ha against 35.5 kg/ha in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Belarus and Czechia?
- 1.86 kg/ha, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Czechia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 44th and Czechia ranks 47th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).