Belarus vs New Caledonia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Belarus
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 39.64 kg/ha against 37.36 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 2.28 kg/ha.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 44th and New Caledonia ranks 41st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.22 kg/ha | 22.62 kg/ha | 0.5929 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 29.99 kg/ha | 38.99 kg/ha | 9 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 35.55 kg/ha | 39.82 kg/ha | 4.27 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 35.34 kg/ha | 39.86 kg/ha | 4.52 kg/ha | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Belarus or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 39.64 kg/ha against 37.36 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Belarus and New Caledonia?
- 2.28 kg/ha, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and New Caledonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and New Caledonia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 44th and New Caledonia ranks 41st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).