Belarus vs Tajikistan: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Belarus
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 39.63 kg/ha against 37.36 kg/ha in Belarus, a difference of 2.27 kg/ha.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Belarus ranks 44th and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.22 kg/ha | 20.79 kg/ha | 2.43 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2000s | 29.99 kg/ha | 14 kg/ha | 15.99 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2010s | 35.55 kg/ha | 21.36 kg/ha | 14.2 kg/ha | Belarus |
| 2020s | 35.34 kg/ha | 38.92 kg/ha | 3.58 kg/ha | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Belarus or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 39.63 kg/ha against 37.36 kg/ha in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Belarus and Tajikistan?
- 2.27 kg/ha, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Tajikistan rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Belarus ranks 44th and Tajikistan ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).