Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Serbia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Serbia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 31.45 kg/ha against 30.77 kg/ha in Serbia, a difference of 0.68 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.45 kg/ha | 39.14 kg/ha | 19.69 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2010s | 31.11 kg/ha | 32.24 kg/ha | 1.13 kg/ha | Serbia |
| 2020s | 30.55 kg/ha | 29.48 kg/ha | 1.07 kg/ha | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Serbia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 31.45 kg/ha against 30.77 kg/ha in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 0.68 kg/ha, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 55th and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).