Botswana vs Mexico: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Mexico
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 21.58 kg/ha against 21.04 kg/ha in Mexico, a difference of 0.54 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Botswana ranks 92nd and Mexico ranks 95th of 201 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.62 kg/ha | 6.04 kg/ha | 3.42 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1970s | 3.08 kg/ha | 13 kg/ha | 9.92 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1980s | 2.96 kg/ha | 20.81 kg/ha | 17.85 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 1990s | 4.59 kg/ha | 17.34 kg/ha | 12.75 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2000s | 5.4 kg/ha | 16.11 kg/ha | 10.71 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2010s | 16.54 kg/ha | 20.13 kg/ha | 3.59 kg/ha | Mexico |
| 2020s | 18.72 kg/ha | 19.27 kg/ha | 0.5569 kg/ha | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Botswana or Mexico?
- Botswana, at 21.58 kg/ha against 21.04 kg/ha in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Botswana and Mexico?
- 0.54 kg/ha, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mexico?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Mexico rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 92nd and Mexico ranks 95th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).