Botswana vs Yugoslav SFR: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Botswana
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 21.73 kg/ha against 21.58 kg/ha in Botswana, a difference of 0.15 kg/ha.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 92nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 89th of 201 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.62 kg/ha | 16.16 kg/ha | 13.54 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 3.08 kg/ha | 24.07 kg/ha | 20.99 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 2.96 kg/ha | 29.87 kg/ha | 26.92 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 3.13 kg/ha | 24.49 kg/ha | 21.36 kg/ha | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Botswana or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 21.73 kg/ha against 21.58 kg/ha in Botswana as of 1991.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Botswana and Yugoslav SFR?
- 0.15 kg/ha, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Botswana and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Botswana ranks 92nd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 89th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).