Brazil vs Georgia: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Brazil
- Georgia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 34.09 kg/ha against 33.11 kg/ha in Georgia, a difference of 0.98 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Brazil ranks 51st and Georgia ranks 54th of 201 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.51 kg/ha | 12.71 kg/ha | 0.8008 kg/ha | Brazil |
| 2000s | 17.43 kg/ha | 12.65 kg/ha | 4.78 kg/ha | Brazil |
| 2010s | 24.43 kg/ha | 14.22 kg/ha | 10.21 kg/ha | Brazil |
| 2020s | 34.22 kg/ha | 33.53 kg/ha | 0.6827 kg/ha | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Brazil or Georgia?
- Brazil, at 34.09 kg/ha against 33.11 kg/ha in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Brazil and Georgia?
- 0.98 kg/ha, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Georgia rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Brazil ranks 51st and Georgia ranks 54th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).