Burundi vs Rwanda: Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area
Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area over time
- Burundi
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 5.72 kg/ha against 5.64 kg/ha in Burundi, a difference of 0.08 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.
Burundi ranks 154th and Rwanda ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3557 kg/ha | 0.6689 kg/ha | 0.3132 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.5876 kg/ha | 0.7865 kg/ha | 0.1989 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.8021 kg/ha | 0.9891 kg/ha | 0.1871 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 0.881 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | 0.146 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0.9616 kg/ha | 1.89 kg/ha | 0.9285 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 3.2 kg/ha | 4.99 kg/ha | 1.79 kg/ha | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 5.11 kg/ha | 6.02 kg/ha | 0.9056 kg/ha | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area, Burundi or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 5.72 kg/ha against 5.64 kg/ha in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area between Burundi and Rwanda?
- 0.08 kg/ha, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Rwanda rank globally for volatilisation — cropland nitrogen per unit area?
- Burundi ranks 154th and Rwanda ranks 153rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Volatilisation — Cropland nitrogen per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).